Cooling Tower Makeup Water Calculation – Accurate Formulas & Tools

Cooling Tower Blowdown Calculation – The Definitive Guide for Process Engineers
In 2025, water scarcity, zero-liquid-discharge mandates, and $1,500–$4,000/ML water charges in California, Texas, and the EU have turned cooling tower blowdown from a “maintenance footnote” into one of the top three operating cost drivers in refineries, petrochemical plants, and power stations. Yet 68% of sites still use the outdated “Cycles = 4–6 and hope for the best” rule of thumb. The result? Either massive over-blowdown (wasting 15–40% of makeup water) or severe scaling that costs $500k–$3M per forced outage.
This article gives you the exact, modern calculation methods used by the top 10% of plants in 2024–2025 — complete mass-balance equations, silica prediction curves, automated Excel/Python tools, and real 2025 case studies.
1. The Four Variables That Actually Control Blowdown
| Variable | Symbol | Typical Range | What Happens if Ignored |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cycles of Concentration | COC | 4–10+ | Primary economic lever |
| Evaporation Loss | 0.8–1.8% of circulation | Fixed by heat load | |
| Windage / Drift Loss | 0.05–0.3% of circulation | Usually small but never zero | |
| Blowdown | Calculated | The only true control valve |
2. The Fundamental Mass-Balance Equation (Never Simplified)
For any dissolved species (TDS, Ca, SiO, Cl):
Cycles of Concentration (COC)
Blowdown (B)
✅ This is the only equation you will ever need.
3. Step-by-Step Calculation Workflow (2025 Best Practice)
Step 1 – Fix the Evaporation Rate
Refined 2025 rule of thumb:
More accurate heat-balance form:
Where:
- = circulation rate (m³/h)
- kJ/kg·K
- kJ/kg
Step 2 – Decide the Limiting Constituent
- Silica (SiO) → 85% of plants
- Calcium hardness (LSI/RSI) → 12%
- Chlorides / TDS → <3%
Step 3 – Set the Maximum Allowable Concentration
| Limiting Ion | Typical 2025 Max | Controlling Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Silica (SiO) | 150–180 mg/L | Amorphous silica solubility |
| Ca as CaCO | LSI ≤ +2.2 or RSI ≥ 6.0 | Calcite scaling |
| Chlorides | 800–1500 mg/L | Pitting corrosion |
2025 Silica Solubility Correlation
(Valid 20–70 °C, pH 7–9.5)
At 40 °C sump → 170–180 ppm achievable with modern dispersants.
Step 4 – Calculate Maximum Achievable COC
Step 5 – Final Blowdown
4. Real 2025 Case Studies
Case A – Gulf Coast Refinery
- Circulation = 48,000 m³/h
- Makeup: 42 mg/L SiO, 180 mg/L CaCO
- Old: COC = 4 → m³/h → $2.1M/year
- New: COC = 8.2 → m³/h
- ✅ Water saved = 700 m³/h
- ✅ Annual savings = $1.4M
Case B – Zero-Liquid-Discharge Petrochemical (India)
- Target: m³/h
- Achieved: COC = 28
- ✅ Makeup reduced by 92%
- ✅ Remaining blowdown crystallized
5. Ready-to-Copy Excel / Google Sheets Formula
=LET( E, B1*B2*0.00185, W, B1*(B5/100), COCsilica, (B4*B6)/B3, B, E/(COCsilica-1) + W, ROUND(B,1) )
6. Live Python Calculator
def cooling_tower_blowdown(circ_m3h, deltaT_C, SiO2_makeup, SiO2_max=175, windage_pct=0.1, dispersant_factor=1.05): E = circ_m3h * deltaT_C * 0.00184 W = circ_m3h * (windage_pct / 100) COC_max = (SiO2_max * dispersant_factor) / SiO2_makeup B = E / (COC_max - 1) + W return { 'Evaporation_m3h': round(E,1), 'Windage_m3h' : round(W,1), 'COC_achievable' : round(COC_max,2), 'Blowdown_m3h' : round(B,1), 'Water_saved_vs_COC4_%': round(100*(1 - B/(E/(4-1)+W)),1) }
7. 2025 Pro Tips Most Consultants Still Miss
- Never fix COC — fix blowdown and back-calculate COC.
- Silica controls 9 out of 10 towers.
- Side-stream RO on 5–10% of blowdown pushes COC > 20.
- Windage is never zero.
- Recalculate every quarter.
Takeaway Checklist
- Measure actual evaporation
- Analyse SiO, Ca, Mg, Cl monthly
- Track LSI/RSI weekly
- Target COC using silica
- Install conductivity + silica override control
- Consider RO if COC > 12 needed
✅ Final Takeaway
Master blowdown in 2025 → cut water use 30–70%, eliminate 90% of scaling outages, and turn your cooling tower from cost centre to profit centre.

